[rsbac] Syscall return value

[Amon Ott]

On Wednesday, 2. July 2003 00:25, Tommy wrote:
> I have a problem when using a syscall registered with 
> rsbac_reg_register_syscall. I have read on the documentation of REG that 
the 
> return code of the syscall callback function is the value returned to the 
> process, while I've found that the return code is always -1 or a positive 
> value.

If -1, does the errno variable show the correct value?
 
> P.S.: I've also found two errors in the documentation regarding generic 
lists. 
> When dealing with rsbac_list_register and rsbac_list_lol_register, in the 
> prototypes of the two functions the pointer for default values of data and 
> subdata are missing.

Right, the list doc is still in the 1.2.0 state, needs to be updated.

A lot of work on documentation is in progress, please hold out a few more 
weeks.

Amon.
-- 
http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22