[rsbac] question about the PM model

[Sebastian]

as far I know DRM has some rights and data is encrypted, PM model has rights
and is data is not encrypted.
for DRM you can get a key and look at the data, PM is user dependant
DRM is microsfot, PM is ....

regards

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Wesdorp" <jcwesdorp at planet.nl>
To: "RSBAC Discussion and Announcements" <rsbac at rsbac.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:51 PM
Subject: [rsbac] question about the PM model


> I'm currently working on a document about RSBAC, it's a project I do for
> school. When I'm finished I will let you all known where to get a copy.
> My main interest is getting RSBAC running on my ADSL server here at home.
>
> I just read about the Privacy Model. Is it a right statement that the
> basic function of the PM is equal to Microsoft's DRM? The principes
> (purpose binding and necessity for data collection and processing) for
> DRM are the same as PM, I don't know for sure but I think there not
> based on any law (except there own, that prevent us from being the real
> boss on our own systems :(  ). I question my own statement on the fact
> the in all the articles I read about DRM they talk about online checking
> permissions.
>
> My questions are:
> - Is my statement right (PM = DRM)?
> - Could the PM model be used for the same functions that DRM is going to
> be used for?
> - Is PM still evolving?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Chris Wesdorp.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rsbac mailing list
> rsbac at rsbac.org
> http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
>