[rsbac] question about the PM model

Amon Ott ao at rsbac.org
Thu Feb 13 15:50:42 MET 2003


On Tuesday 04 February 2003 18:51, Chris Wesdorp wrote:
> I just read about the Privacy Model. Is it a right statement that the 
> basic function of the PM is equal to Microsoft's DRM? The principes 
> (purpose binding and necessity for data collection and processing) for 
> DRM are the same as PM, I don't know for sure but I think there not 
> based on any law (except there own, that prevent us from being the real 
> boss on our own systems :(  ). I question my own statement on the fact 
> the in all the articles I read about DRM they talk about online checking 
> permissions.
> 
> My questions are:
> - Is my statement right (PM = DRM)?
> - Could the PM model be used for the same functions that DRM is going to 
> be used for?

These issues I'd like to leave for Simone to explain, she is on this list.

> - Is PM still evolving?

Well, slowly. PM updates have been on my to-do list for a while.

Amon.
--
http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22


More information about the rsbac mailing list