[rsbac] REG module
Amon Ott
ao at rsbac.org
Wed Apr 9 10:01:21 MEST 2003
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 20:22, Tommy wrote:
> I know I should study and stop bothering all of you with my mails... but
I've
> found that the problem probably lies in the ext3 filesystem I use. In fact
my
> module works well with backups in rsbac_write_open() (i. e. with the
original
> RSBAC sources) when the filesystem is ReiserFS (both on SMP and single-cpu
> machines). To be honest I haven't tested ext3 on a single-cpu, so the
problem
> could also be ext3 + SMP. I'll try as soon as I can. I've read that ext3
has
> some bugs that will be fixed in the next release of the kernel. Perhaps the
> problem is one of these?
We had some problems with secure delete on ext3 before, but no backup/SMP
related ones.
Again my question: Why do you have to access files directly? Would it be
possible to use a list registration for your data? The list file accesses are
known to be stable.
Could you please retry with ext2, so we can get closer to the problem? Also,
a System.map is required to find the Oopsing function from the Oops report.
Amon.
--
http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22
More information about the rsbac
mailing list