[rsbac] RSBAC + sparc64
ao at rsbac.org
Thu Feb 13 16:06:15 MET 2003
Sorry for answering so late, I had my mind full of too many other things.
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 13:59, Andre Pohl wrote:
> I tried again with those patches applied. The "Function not implemented"
> error is gone, but I couldn't get the admin tools running. I compiled
> them with gcc 2.95.4 with asm link in <kernel>/include set to
> asm-sparc64 and the assembler exits with an error. gcc 3.0 compiles the
> package, but I get tons of warnings about shifting over the range of a
> type (32bit usermode, 64bit kernelmode?). When I try to set the
> auth_may_setuid attribute for /bin/login I get an error "Unknown error
-1018 is the RSBAC error code for EINVALIDVALUE.
> After patching the unistd.h in asm-sparc I tried to compile the admin
> tools changing the <kernel>/include/asm link to asm-sparc. Now the tools
> are build without any critical warning or error but when I try to set
> the auth_may_setuid for /bin/login I get a "RSBAC_EINVALIDVALUE" error.
How do you try to set this?
Just rechecked, all RSBAC type definition with shifts use __u64 etc, which
should work with any system.
Could you please send me the compile warnings about the shifts? The invalid
value is probably related to that. BTW: What is the byte order in sparc64, is
it the same as in i386?
http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22
More information about the rsbac