[rsbac] About SCD T_swap.

Javier J. Martínez Cabezón tazok.id0 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 17:56:00 CET 2009

PD: I'm seeing the 1.3.7 rsbac version...

2009/1/12 Javier J. Martínez Cabezón <tazok.id0 en gmail.com>:
> In rc_main.c you have for example that all requests made to MAP_EXEC
> that doesn't be FILE get a DON'T CARE answer I'm right thinking that
> if you make a MAP_EXEC call to a TARGET NONE (which should go to SCD
> other) it get's not checked at all?
> 2009/1/12 Amon Ott <ao en rsbac.org>:
>> Am Sünndag 11 Januor 2009 schrieb Javier J. Martínez Cabezón:
>>> Hi all, while looking some code of 1.3.7 rsbac version (swapfile.c)
>>> when you add one partition/file with swapon and swapoff it only checks
>>> that you own the capability CAP_SYS_ADMIN and if you have
>>> MODIFY_SYSTEM_DATA in SCD_swap and ADD_TO_KERNEL rights in the
>>> file/device to add. ADD_TO_KERNEL (and REMOVE_TO_KERNEL) to SCD_swap
>>> is ignored isn't it?. I'm wrong thinking that the only right useful in
>>> SCD type swap is MODIFY_SYSTEM_DATA?. I think that some others SCD has
>>> the same isn't it?
>> Most SCD targets only have checks for GET_STATUS_DATA (read) and
>> MODIFY_SYSTEM_DATA (write settings). The special case is SCD other, which is
>> used by some models (RC, ACL) to control access to NONE targets.
>> Amon.
>> --
>> http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsbac mailing list
>> rsbac en rsbac.org
>> http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac

More information about the rsbac mailing list