[rsbac] 1.4.0-rc3 check_comp_rc: rc_role wrong?

Bernhard Seibold bernhard.seibold at uni-ulm.de
Thu Jan 8 02:37:43 CET 2009


On Mi, 2009-01-07 at 12:48 +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> Am Dingsdag 25 November 2008 schrieb Amon Ott:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 22:44, Bernhard Seibold wrote:
> > > On Di, 2008-11-18 at 16:52 +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> > > > On Monday 17 November 2008 19:32, Bernhard Seibold wrote:
> > > > > User 1000 is rc_role 4. No errors with 2.6.26.7 with 1.4.0-rc2
> > > > > (and your one-line ipv6 patch).
> > > > >
> > > > > 0000009047|check_comp_rc(): pid 2299432064 (gweather-applet),
> > > > > owner 1000, rc_role 0, NETOBJ rc_type 0, request CREATE ->
> > > > > NOT_GRANTED!
> > > >
> > > > The pid is complete rubbish here. Just corrected output at
> > > > several places. I have attached a patch, can you please retry
> > > > with it?
> > >
> > > The PIDs are now ok, but of course the problem persists. This was
> > > logged while starting Apache (in Softmode, by user 1000 from a
> > > "sudo -s" shell), with debug_adf_auth and debug_adf_rc turned on:
> > >
> > > 0000002834|rsbac_set_attr(): Trying to set attribute for process 0!
> > > 0000002835|rsbac_adf_set_attr_rc: rsbac_set_attr() for rc_role
> > > returned error!
> >
> > Right. The problem is that the pid struct pointer is null here, this
> > is what triggers these error messages. Now I have to find out why.
> >
> > All other errors you have listed are consequences of this.
> 
> Can you please retest with latest svn code? Another user reported that these 
> problems are now finally gone for him.

I can confirm this, errors are gone. Thanks.


Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.rsbac.org/pipermail/rsbac/attachments/20090108/fdf363f5/attachment.pgp 


More information about the rsbac mailing list