[rsbac] Distribution requirements

[Peter Scheer]

Hello,

If you consider debian, it may be a good idea to have a look at 
adamantix.org
Adamantix is a distribution, based on debian, which closely integrates 
with rsbac (and pax)

Peter

Martin Heyer wrote:

>Hello,
>The only problem with those big distributors schould be their vendor-kernel.
>I was not able to patch rsbac into the SuSE-sources for example.
>It took me some time to run a vanilla kernel. SuSE also prefers SELinux and 
>patches it into their kernel...If you have some Linux skills there should be 
>no big problem, but if you want it easier try debian. It ran for me also with 
>an unpatched kernel.
>Martin
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am new to RSBAC but plan to dive into this implementation of MAC for
>>Linux.  What is the most commonly used distribution on this list for
>>RSBAC?  My personal favorite is Slackware.  Are there any distribution
>>specific problems to implement RSBAC?
>>
>>Thank you in advance.
>>
>>Subba Rao.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rsbac mailing list
>>rsbac at rsbac.org
>>http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>rsbac mailing list
>rsbac at rsbac.org
>http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
>  
>