[rsbac] Hunk #4 FAILED at 793--with pax for 2.6.6 applied

Stoyan Zhekov sto at zhware.net
Tue May 25 09:56:43 CEST 2004


Stoyan Zhekov wrote:

> 
> http://pax.grsecurity.net/pax-linux-2.6.6-200405182000.patch - that's 
> one is the latest (25-May-2004). What about it?

Hm, to answer to myself. Done:
1. apply [ http://rsbac.org/pre/patch-2.6.6-v1.2.3-pre5.gz ] to 
linux-kernel 2.6.6 vanila sources
2. apply [ http://pax.grsecurity.net/pax-linux-2.6.6-200405182000.patch ]

The result:

patching file mm/mmap.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 332 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 495 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 548 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 600 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 611 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 788 (offset 50 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 824 (offset 50 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1604 with fuzz 2 (offset 782 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 1624.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 1644.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 1672.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 1832.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1886.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 1928.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 1984.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 2086.
Hunk #17 FAILED at 2156.
Hunk #18 FAILED at 2292.
Hunk #19 FAILED at 2332.
Hunk #20 FAILED at 2354.
Hunk #21 FAILED at 2377.
Hunk #22 FAILED at 2396.
Hunk #23 FAILED at 2413.
Hunk #24 FAILED at 2448.
Hunk #25 FAILED at 2492.
Hunk #26 FAILED at 2522.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1839 (offset 77 lines).
18 out of 27 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/mmap.c.rej

So in both cases (pax,rsbac and rsbac,pax) they conflict in mm/mmap.c




More information about the rsbac mailing list