[rsbac] Hunk #4 FAILED at 793--with pax for 2.6.6 applied
Roy Lanek
lanek at novenine.com
Tue May 25 09:37:56 CEST 2004
Amon Ott wrote (Tue 25-May-2004, 08:42:23 +0200)
> Could you please also test, whether it works when patching RSBAC in first
> and PaX afterwards? This is what I usually do myself.
It produces quite many `Hunk #mm FAILED at nn' more; i.e.,
there is no symmetry.
I am rebuilding right now my maintenance kernel with
a mere PaX-patch applied (the most recent one that I
have just discovered ... see previous ==[ continued]==
addendum).
As soon I am ready (daily power outages), I will detail.
/Roy
More information about the rsbac
mailing list