[rsbac] Hunk #4 FAILED at 793--with pax for 2.6.6 applied

Roy Lanek lanek at novenine.com
Tue May 25 09:37:56 CEST 2004

Amon Ott wrote (Tue 25-May-2004, 08:42:23 +0200)

> Could you please also test, whether it works when patching RSBAC in first 
> and PaX afterwards? This is what I usually do myself.

It produces quite many `Hunk #mm FAILED at nn' more; i.e.,
there is no symmetry.

I am rebuilding right now my maintenance kernel with
a mere PaX-patch applied (the most recent one that I
have just discovered ... see previous ==[ continued]==

As soon I am ready (daily power outages), I will detail.


More information about the rsbac mailing list