[rsbac] RSBAC + sparc64
apohl at gmx.de
Tue Mar 18 17:17:09 MET 2003
Amon Ott wrote:
>Just rechecked, all RSBAC type definition with shifts use __u64 etc, which
>should work with any system.
I think I found the problem: In asm-sparc64 the __u64 datatype is
defined as unsigned long and therefore only 32 bit long. The i386 and
sparc architectures define __u64 as unsigned long long which should be
64 bit long.
Is this an error in the kernel headers or is the basetype long 64 bit in
I'll try to change these settings and we'll see what happens.
More information about the rsbac